2014 Porn News Holiday Wrap-Up featuring ex-pornstars Monica Foster and Desi Foxx (part 2)
Part One
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ve7dfrTzP6o
Thursday, January 8, 2015
CounterDefendant Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group SAYS "there was no attorney-client relationship with Counterclaimant" (Blogger Crystal Cox)
Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group SAYS;
"there was no attorney-client relationship with Counterclaimant, no contract existed for representation of Counterclaimant, and Counterdefendant had not committed to the representation of Counterclaimant. "
Source
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.220.0.pdf
(Page 3)
So if there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group act in telling Eugene Volokh that a settlement was best for Cox, that he would "bow out", or offer a co-counseling relationship?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group negotiate a "settlement" with opposing counsel that he decided was in my best interest?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group tell other First Amendment Attorneys that he represented me, and pretty much had it handled, so they would not contact me to represent me?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group take it upon himself to try and reword a court opinion or something action to change my ruling in a way that would benefit his present and future clients, mostly in the Porn Industry?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group tell Eugene Volokh that he indeed was my attorney in this matter, then offer that possibly Eugene Volokh could co-counsel?
So Randazza says he was not my attorney and had "no attorney-client relationship" yet he made all these actions, discussions, offers, negotiations on "my behalf", REALLY? And that is not a violation of law or constitutional rights in any way?
Then after this REPRESENTATION when I fired him for lying, being a pompass ass, violating my constitutional rights, berating me, talking a deal behind my back, lying about what I wanted the outcome to be and other reasons then he used his legal knowledge, my proprietary information, my legal strategy, my private information and information he gained through representation; to defame me, harass me, bully me, intimidate me, ruin my quality of life and he used his media connections to accuse me of crimes in which I had no adjudication or due process on in any way and simply ruined my life, attacked me, violated my privacy rights, harassed and violated the rights of my sources, sued me and my sources, and engaged in conspiracy with a large amount of legal bloggers, lawyers, investigators, online media, NPR, Forbes, and even Judges.
After this Clear REPRESENTATION, Marc Randazza sued my sources that were reporting on him such as Monica Foster aKa Alexandra Mayers and Desi Foxx aKa Diana Grandmason, he violated there and my privacy rights along with Inventor Eliot Bernstein. Randazza got my phone records, travel information, bank information, home address, names and contacts of customers and clients, information on all my domain names and intellectual property, information on my church mission, wire information, personal private information and contacts and put this in the public domain in legal cases and media to further harass and attack me. All this and he was MY ATTORNEY.
He even bullied, harassed and threatened my friends, clients, ex's, customers, church, insiders, sources and others to get information about me and put fear and intimidation into them.
Marc Randazza DID have and attorney-client relationship with Counterclaimant" (Blogger Crystal Cox) AND he clearly abused his power and privilege as an officer of the courts and the legal process. As well as used his CLOUT as an attorney to DESTROY my life knowingly with willful and wanton, clear intent in a clear abuse of power and process over a former client.
More on this Topic of Did Marc Randazza Represent Crystal Cox as her attorney or NOT?
http://investigativeblogger.blogspot.com/2014/12/marc-randazza-again-admits-to-have-been.html
Full Docket
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html
"there was no attorney-client relationship with Counterclaimant, no contract existed for representation of Counterclaimant, and Counterdefendant had not committed to the representation of Counterclaimant. "
Source
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.220.0.pdf
(Page 3)
So if there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group act in telling Eugene Volokh that a settlement was best for Cox, that he would "bow out", or offer a co-counseling relationship?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group negotiate a "settlement" with opposing counsel that he decided was in my best interest?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group tell other First Amendment Attorneys that he represented me, and pretty much had it handled, so they would not contact me to represent me?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group take it upon himself to try and reword a court opinion or something action to change my ruling in a way that would benefit his present and future clients, mostly in the Porn Industry?
If there was "no attorney-client relationship" then on what authority did Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group tell Eugene Volokh that he indeed was my attorney in this matter, then offer that possibly Eugene Volokh could co-counsel?
So Randazza says he was not my attorney and had "no attorney-client relationship" yet he made all these actions, discussions, offers, negotiations on "my behalf", REALLY? And that is not a violation of law or constitutional rights in any way?
So CLEARLY Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did represent me, Crystal Cox.
Then after this REPRESENTATION when I fired him for lying, being a pompass ass, violating my constitutional rights, berating me, talking a deal behind my back, lying about what I wanted the outcome to be and other reasons then he used his legal knowledge, my proprietary information, my legal strategy, my private information and information he gained through representation; to defame me, harass me, bully me, intimidate me, ruin my quality of life and he used his media connections to accuse me of crimes in which I had no adjudication or due process on in any way and simply ruined my life, attacked me, violated my privacy rights, harassed and violated the rights of my sources, sued me and my sources, and engaged in conspiracy with a large amount of legal bloggers, lawyers, investigators, online media, NPR, Forbes, and even Judges.
After this Clear REPRESENTATION, Marc Randazza sued my sources that were reporting on him such as Monica Foster aKa Alexandra Mayers and Desi Foxx aKa Diana Grandmason, he violated there and my privacy rights along with Inventor Eliot Bernstein. Randazza got my phone records, travel information, bank information, home address, names and contacts of customers and clients, information on all my domain names and intellectual property, information on my church mission, wire information, personal private information and contacts and put this in the public domain in legal cases and media to further harass and attack me. All this and he was MY ATTORNEY.
He even bullied, harassed and threatened my friends, clients, ex's, customers, church, insiders, sources and others to get information about me and put fear and intimidation into them.
More on this Topic of Did Marc Randazza Represent Crystal Cox as her attorney or NOT?
http://investigativeblogger.blogspot.com/2014/12/marc-randazza-again-admits-to-have-been.html
Full Docket
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html
Marc Randazza Talks a Good Game for Freedom of Speech and First Amendment Rights, However Marc Randazza DOES not Walk the Talk when it comes to his own Butthurt EGO Trip and the First Amendment Rights of Others. Marc Randazza is a Hypocrite, a Liar, an Asshole and has Violated my First Amendment Rights.
"What Do Sandra Fluke, Ted Klaudt, Rush Limbaugh, Isaac Eiland-Hall, Blogger Crystal Cox and the Double Talking First Amendment YAP of Marc Randazza Asshole have in Common?
Marc Randazza Emails Blogger Crystal Cox and Demands She Turn over Marc Randazza .com, even though Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group and Corbin Fisher, has fought for others to own domain names with people's name and even worse.
Though Marc Randazza knows that Blogger Crystal Cox won a WIPO case involving several Domain Names of Top Lawyers of one of the Worlds Biggest Law Firms, Proskauer Rose, still Marc Randazza threatens me, blogger Crystal Cox, that I if I don't turn over the Domain Name that will make him an enemy. Marc Randazza knows I have every legal and ethical right to have bought and to own Marc Randazza .com, yet Marc Randazza is teaching me a lesson by working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox to steal my Domain Names as Assets, even though a couple of months ago Marc Randazza could have bought Marc Randazza .com for $10.
Marc Randazza is a such a hypocrite as he writes about the Sandra Fluke, Rush Limbaugh Issue and seems to be defending free speech, yet at the same time claims that she is Butthurt and that Butthurt does not pay in the United States on His Watch. Yet at the Same Time Marc Randazza is trying to make Blogger Crystal Cox PAY for his Butthurt over not buying his own name as a Dotcom (DotDUMB that Was), anyway now Marc Randazza is headed to Portland Oregon for a March 23 Deposition, one in which I am sure if you check his communications records, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff's Camp to work AGAINST Crystal Cox Blogger, and Against Free Speech.
In Marc Randazza's article regarding Sandra Fluke, Marc Randazza Said this,
"When a plaintiff alleging defamation is a public figure, he or she must show that the allegedly false statements were made with actual malice – that is, knowing falsity, or a reckless disregard for the truth. N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan" SO Marc Randazza is fully aware that in Obsidian V. Cox, Obsidian and Kevin Padrick are Public Figures and I had NO Actual Malice. Marc Randazza spoke with me and told other First Amendment Lawyers that he represented me, Blogger Crystal Cox, and claimed to have been negotiating with the Plaintiff, which was news to me. Now if Marc Randazza claims this did not happen, I am sure the other Attorneys will not lose their career in a perjured deposition to lie for Marc Randazza.
Link to the Butthurt Sandra Fluke / Marc Randazza Article
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh
I want to Sue Marc Randazza, email me at SavvyBroker@yahoo.com to represent me Pro Bono. Surely Marc Randazza has liability insurance for his yaps and threats. And isn't it illegal to act as if he represented me and try and negotiate a deal giving my private information to the Plaintiff, when he had not discussed with me, the "Alleged" Client?
Marc Randazza may flat out lie to you and say he was Subpoenad and did not contact the Plaintiff First, thing is over 6 years I have registered hundreds of "other people's names" as domain names, so why in the world would the Plaintiff Subpoena only ONE. The Truth is that Marc Randazza contacted them to make me, Blogger Crystal Cox, pay for the Marc Randazza Butthurt.
Here is the Article where Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group says that Butthurt is Butthurt, and not defamation and that Butthurt does not pay in the United States on his watch.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh even though when it comes to Butthurt Marc Randazza he sure is teaching Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson in what it is to be an "enemy" of the Infamous double talking, hypocritical ASSHOLE Marc Randazza.
Marc Randazza Defended Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , yet Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards.
Oh and Let's not forget the Ted Klaudt Common Law Copyright Dispute, and check out the Photo that Marc Randazza used for that article, (it is below on the left). In the Ted Klaudt case.
The Headline Reads "Former Rep Ted Klaudt claims "common law copyright" in his name to try and suppress news stories about him raping his kids".
Marc Randazza Says, "We sure do see a lot of intellectual property abuse around here. This has to be the best one yet. Former South Dakota State Representative Ted Klaudt claims that he has a "common law copyright" in his name, and thus any news organization or other publication that uses his name must pay him a licensing fee of $500,000."
Yet Marc Randazza feels that he has copyright of his name. So the Name Marc Randazza is a bigger, better name than Former South Dakota State Representative Ted Klaudt's name? How does that Work? Marc Randazza is willing to take help the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to take the Domain Names of Blogger Crystal Cox in effort to hide the Secret Deals, Corruption, and Conflicts of Industry, involving Law Firms Tonkon TorpSussman Shank, Perkins Coie and Miller Nash and involving Solar Tax Credits and the Actions of Obsidian Finance Group's Kevin Padrick as a Trustee in a $40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy out of Bend Oregon. Marc Randazza is also willing to STOMP on the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of all in helping a Plaintiff that he admitted was certainly hurting Free Speech for All.
In the Ted Klaudt Scandal, Marc Randazza accuses the actions of Ted Klaudt to be simply to stop a "news organization" from informing the public. Which is exactly what I was doing. Obsidian Finance Group had no legal right to be the Trustee, neither did Kevin Padrick, as he was an insider. This case needs investigated and many were harmed and not just financially, lives were ruined. Marc Randazza will now be named in the Federal RICO Complaint I am Filing, as Well as FBI Complaints and Department of Justice Complaints. I have been investigating this story for 4 years, and Butthurt Marc Randazza is now on the side of suppressing information but taking my domain names and siding with the WRONG side First Amendment Rights.
In that Same Article Marc Randazza Says this to Ted Klaudt.
"Guess what Klaudt, you just made yourself even more famous, short eyes."
I Say This to Hypocrite Marc Randazza, "Guess What Fuckhead Marc Randazza, your working with the Bad Guys and you WILL Be even "more famous" as a thug, liar and asshole" But surely that was what you were going for.
Source information for Marc Randazza Article and Marc Randazza Case and Yammer Research
Ted Klaudt Article, Complete with Photo
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/former-rep-ted-klaudt-claims-common-law-copyright-his-name-try-and-suppress-news-stories-a
Rush Limbaugh, Sandra Fluke Research Links
http://www.easternecho.com/index.php/article/2012/03/pointcounterpoint_limbaugh_slut_scandaldebate_hijacked_by_the_left
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/09/megyn-kelly-sandra-fluke-oreilly_n_1334470.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204603004577269491399954950.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/07/patricia-heaton-s-history-of-outbursts-sandra-fluke-attack-no-anomaly.html
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh
Marc Randazza is a LIAR when He Claims to Love the First Amendment, Marc Randazza only loves the First Amendment when it gets him a JOB.
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" Case Research Links
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-on-wrong-side-of-free.html
Posted here by
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
aKa, Marc Randazza ENEMY
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com"
Marc Randazza Emails Blogger Crystal Cox and Demands She Turn over Marc Randazza .com, even though Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group and Corbin Fisher, has fought for others to own domain names with people's name and even worse.
Though Marc Randazza knows that Blogger Crystal Cox won a WIPO case involving several Domain Names of Top Lawyers of one of the Worlds Biggest Law Firms, Proskauer Rose, still Marc Randazza threatens me, blogger Crystal Cox, that I if I don't turn over the Domain Name that will make him an enemy. Marc Randazza knows I have every legal and ethical right to have bought and to own Marc Randazza .com, yet Marc Randazza is teaching me a lesson by working with the Plaintiff in Obsidian Vs. Cox to steal my Domain Names as Assets, even though a couple of months ago Marc Randazza could have bought Marc Randazza .com for $10.
Marc Randazza is a such a hypocrite as he writes about the Sandra Fluke, Rush Limbaugh Issue and seems to be defending free speech, yet at the same time claims that she is Butthurt and that Butthurt does not pay in the United States on His Watch. Yet at the Same Time Marc Randazza is trying to make Blogger Crystal Cox PAY for his Butthurt over not buying his own name as a Dotcom (DotDUMB that Was), anyway now Marc Randazza is headed to Portland Oregon for a March 23 Deposition, one in which I am sure if you check his communications records, Marc Randazza contacted the Plaintiff's Camp to work AGAINST Crystal Cox Blogger, and Against Free Speech.
In Marc Randazza's article regarding Sandra Fluke, Marc Randazza Said this,
"When a plaintiff alleging defamation is a public figure, he or she must show that the allegedly false statements were made with actual malice – that is, knowing falsity, or a reckless disregard for the truth. N.Y. Times Co. v. Sullivan" SO Marc Randazza is fully aware that in Obsidian V. Cox, Obsidian and Kevin Padrick are Public Figures and I had NO Actual Malice. Marc Randazza spoke with me and told other First Amendment Lawyers that he represented me, Blogger Crystal Cox, and claimed to have been negotiating with the Plaintiff, which was news to me. Now if Marc Randazza claims this did not happen, I am sure the other Attorneys will not lose their career in a perjured deposition to lie for Marc Randazza.
Link to the Butthurt Sandra Fluke / Marc Randazza Article
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh
I want to Sue Marc Randazza, email me at SavvyBroker@yahoo.com to represent me Pro Bono. Surely Marc Randazza has liability insurance for his yaps and threats. And isn't it illegal to act as if he represented me and try and negotiate a deal giving my private information to the Plaintiff, when he had not discussed with me, the "Alleged" Client?
Marc Randazza may flat out lie to you and say he was Subpoenad and did not contact the Plaintiff First, thing is over 6 years I have registered hundreds of "other people's names" as domain names, so why in the world would the Plaintiff Subpoena only ONE. The Truth is that Marc Randazza contacted them to make me, Blogger Crystal Cox, pay for the Marc Randazza Butthurt.
Here is the Article where Marc Randazza, Randazza Legal Group says that Butthurt is Butthurt, and not defamation and that Butthurt does not pay in the United States on his watch.
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh even though when it comes to Butthurt Marc Randazza he sure is teaching Blogger Crystal Cox a lesson in what it is to be an "enemy" of the Infamous double talking, hypocritical ASSHOLE Marc Randazza.
Marc Randazza Defended Isaac Eiland-Hall in the buying, owning and using the domain name
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" , yet Marc Randazza emailed me and told me I have no right to own a domain name that resembles his name. Talk about Double Standards.
Oh and Let's not forget the Ted Klaudt Common Law Copyright Dispute, and check out the Photo that Marc Randazza used for that article, (it is below on the left). In the Ted Klaudt case.
The Headline Reads "Former Rep Ted Klaudt claims "common law copyright" in his name to try and suppress news stories about him raping his kids".
Marc Randazza Says, "We sure do see a lot of intellectual property abuse around here. This has to be the best one yet. Former South Dakota State Representative Ted Klaudt claims that he has a "common law copyright" in his name, and thus any news organization or other publication that uses his name must pay him a licensing fee of $500,000."Yet Marc Randazza feels that he has copyright of his name. So the Name Marc Randazza is a bigger, better name than Former South Dakota State Representative Ted Klaudt's name? How does that Work? Marc Randazza is willing to take help the Plaintiff in Obsidian V. Cox to take the Domain Names of Blogger Crystal Cox in effort to hide the Secret Deals, Corruption, and Conflicts of Industry, involving Law Firms Tonkon TorpSussman Shank, Perkins Coie and Miller Nash and involving Solar Tax Credits and the Actions of Obsidian Finance Group's Kevin Padrick as a Trustee in a $40 Million Dollar Bankruptcy out of Bend Oregon. Marc Randazza is also willing to STOMP on the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of all in helping a Plaintiff that he admitted was certainly hurting Free Speech for All.
In the Ted Klaudt Scandal, Marc Randazza accuses the actions of Ted Klaudt to be simply to stop a "news organization" from informing the public. Which is exactly what I was doing. Obsidian Finance Group had no legal right to be the Trustee, neither did Kevin Padrick, as he was an insider. This case needs investigated and many were harmed and not just financially, lives were ruined. Marc Randazza will now be named in the Federal RICO Complaint I am Filing, as Well as FBI Complaints and Department of Justice Complaints. I have been investigating this story for 4 years, and Butthurt Marc Randazza is now on the side of suppressing information but taking my domain names and siding with the WRONG side First Amendment Rights.
In that Same Article Marc Randazza Says this to Ted Klaudt.
"Guess what Klaudt, you just made yourself even more famous, short eyes."
I Say This to Hypocrite Marc Randazza, "Guess What Fuckhead Marc Randazza, your working with the Bad Guys and you WILL Be even "more famous" as a thug, liar and asshole" But surely that was what you were going for.
Source information for Marc Randazza Article and Marc Randazza Case and Yammer Research
Ted Klaudt Article, Complete with Photo
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/former-rep-ted-klaudt-claims-common-law-copyright-his-name-try-and-suppress-news-stories-a
Rush Limbaugh, Sandra Fluke Research Links
http://www.easternecho.com/index.php/article/2012/03/pointcounterpoint_limbaugh_slut_scandaldebate_hijacked_by_the_left
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/09/megyn-kelly-sandra-fluke-oreilly_n_1334470.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204603004577269491399954950.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/07/patricia-heaton-s-history-of-outbursts-sandra-fluke-attack-no-anomaly.html
http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2012/no-sandra-fluke-does-not-have-valid-defamation-claim-against-rush-limbaugh
Marc Randazza is a LIAR when He Claims to Love the First Amendment, Marc Randazza only loves the First Amendment when it gets him a JOB.
"www.GlennBeckRapedAndMurderedAYoungGirlIn1990.com" Case Research Links
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/US_free_speech_lawyer_Marc_Randazza_discusses_Glenn_Beck_parody
http://www.crystalcox.com/2012/03/marc-randazza-on-wrong-side-of-free.html
Posted here by
Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox
aKa, Marc Randazza ENEMY
WhistleblowerMedia@Gmail.com"
Original Posted At
Ronald Green, Randazza Legal Group; Hypocritical Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group claims common law Trademark against Crystal Cox yet whines about the claims of Others.
Hypocritical Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group wrote this article below, seemingly to attack, make fun of, harass and bully a guy because he claimed copyright in his name.
Years later Randazza sued me claiming a Trademark in his name on my Gripe Sites about him.
"Former Rep Ted Klaudt claims "common law copyright" in his name to try and suppress news stories about him raping his kids"
Mr. Klaudt apparently started sending notices of his "common law copyright" to news agencies in order to stop them from reporting on the fact that he is serving time for raping his foster daughters. Klaudt was convicted on four counts of rape for fondling his underage foster daughters in "examinations" that he performed on them under the ruse of claiming that he was going to help them sell their eggs to infertile couples. The sick bastard got 44 years in prison for rape and another 10 years for tampering with witnesses in his trial.
Klaudt's letter to the Associated Press claims that anyone who wants to use his name must "file a written request 20 days in advance," and that he would pursue claims against anyone who violated the notice.
I can't be certain what the motivation for this move might be, but I presume that Klaudt doesn't like the fact that news organizations like to inform the public about sick bastards who molest their own kids -- especially when they happen to be lawmakers (or ex-lawmakers as it were). I guess he figured that this would convince a few people to stop using his name.
Guess what Klaudt, you just made yourself even more famous, short eyes."
Source
http://www.dmlp.org/blog/2009/former-rep-ted-klaudt-claims-common-law-copyright-his-name-try-and-suppress-news-stories-a
Hypocritical Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group will simply sue you, perjure himself to WIPO and STEAL your intellectual property and flat out take your domain names all in the alleged name of a an implied Trademark that he never registered, and never had. And to STOP, SUPPRESS the Free Speech of Blogger Crystal Cox who had many Gripe Sites about him and his Law Firm.
Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group abused the courts, used the Lanham Act, Trademark Laws and Unconstitutional Protective Orders to shut down blogs, steal internet placement and search ranking, harass and bully me, take down content, chill speech, remove content that spoke critical of him and all in the name of ALLEGED Trademark Rights.
Randazza has sent copyright notices to get places like docstoc and Google to remove court motions and other documents and blogs I posted using his name.
Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is above the LAW, Period.
Check out the Full Hypocritical Randazza v. Cox Docket
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html
Years later Randazza sued me claiming a Trademark in his name on my Gripe Sites about him.
"Former Rep Ted Klaudt claims "common law copyright" in his name to try and suppress news stories about him raping his kids"
Mr. Klaudt apparently started sending notices of his "common law copyright" to news agencies in order to stop them from reporting on the fact that he is serving time for raping his foster daughters. Klaudt was convicted on four counts of rape for fondling his underage foster daughters in "examinations" that he performed on them under the ruse of claiming that he was going to help them sell their eggs to infertile couples. The sick bastard got 44 years in prison for rape and another 10 years for tampering with witnesses in his trial.
Klaudt's letter to the Associated Press claims that anyone who wants to use his name must "file a written request 20 days in advance," and that he would pursue claims against anyone who violated the notice.
I can't be certain what the motivation for this move might be, but I presume that Klaudt doesn't like the fact that news organizations like to inform the public about sick bastards who molest their own kids -- especially when they happen to be lawmakers (or ex-lawmakers as it were). I guess he figured that this would convince a few people to stop using his name.
Guess what Klaudt, you just made yourself even more famous, short eyes."
Source
http://www.dmlp.org/blog/2009/former-rep-ted-klaudt-claims-common-law-copyright-his-name-try-and-suppress-news-stories-a
Hypocritical Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group will simply sue you, perjure himself to WIPO and STEAL your intellectual property and flat out take your domain names all in the alleged name of a an implied Trademark that he never registered, and never had. And to STOP, SUPPRESS the Free Speech of Blogger Crystal Cox who had many Gripe Sites about him and his Law Firm.
Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group abused the courts, used the Lanham Act, Trademark Laws and Unconstitutional Protective Orders to shut down blogs, steal internet placement and search ranking, harass and bully me, take down content, chill speech, remove content that spoke critical of him and all in the name of ALLEGED Trademark Rights.
Randazza has sent copyright notices to get places like docstoc and Google to remove court motions and other documents and blogs I posted using his name.
Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group is above the LAW, Period.
Check out the Full Hypocritical Randazza v. Cox Docket
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html
Monica Foster and Desi Foxx, Porn Industry Insiders, Whistleblowers and Independent Investigative Bloggers Year End Report. Including the Gang Stalking, Harassment, and Bullying of Randazza Legal Group.
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Randazza Legal Group Porn Attorney Marc Randazza sued Crystal Cox, Eliot Bernstein, Monica Foster and Desi Foxx in order to harass, bully, gang stalk, intimidate, and suppress speech as well as to violate privacy rights, put us under constant duress and violate our constitutional rights.
This summary is not available. Please
click here to view the post.
Marc J. Randazza Says; "Ms. Mayers got sued because she falsely accused my wife of engaging in prostitution." Ms. Mayers did not ACCUSE, that is another Dumbdazza Lie. Jennifer Randazza is however, ALLEGEDLY, a SLUT.
What an ASSHOLE.
A Lying, Abusive, Overreaching, Unconstitutional, Hypocritical Attorney ASSHOLE.
Asshole Marc Randazza sued me, Blogger Crystal Cox and iViewit inventor Eliot Bernstein, allegedly for a Trademark he did not have and his wife and baby did not have either.
The court motions easily show that later the whiny ass claimed I, Crystal Cox,
Defamed him, then it was extortion.
The court motions easily show that later the whiny ass claimed I, Crystal Cox,
Defamed him, then it was extortion.
Guess he can't make up his befuddled mind what I did to him, just that he is BUTTHURT and intends to use the power of the COURTS in a Clear Abuse of Process and VIOLATION of civil rights, privacy rights and constitutional rights to "Teach me a Lesson".
Marc Randazza says, if you are gunna love Free Speech ya gotta love it all Howie, ya can't just love some of it. Well ya know I mean except for ummm calling my drunken tryst gal a SLUT well that's not protected speech especially if you think that she may have been some sort of alleged escort that may have allegedly had drunken, unprotected sex with me in Cabo.. that's different.
Conceived in Cabo with a Porn Attorney in a Drunken Tryst and NOT a SLUT according to the investigative research team at the Randazza Legal Group Law Firm? Really? R U Sure?
So funny Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group harasses churches, threatens to kill people from what I have heard is going around, he stalks, he bullies, he sues, he intimidates, he supports pedophiles, racists and much worse. Yet he don't like his wife being called a SLUT or any insinuation that she may have ever been a prostitute? REALLY? Say What?
How Offensive really is SLUT to a Guy who Defended Rush Limbaugh
for Calling Sandra Fluke a SLUT. WoW. And I would say, in my ALLEGING Opinion,
that there is WAY more evidence to support a case of Jenny bo Benny Randazza being
a SLUT then Sandra Fluke. Just Sayin'
He himself says he knocked the Bitch up in a Trunken Tryst. Ok he called her by another name, but that's how I see it. Still he said he knocked her up while drunk and a picture of a mixed drink saying where babies come from. Real proud DADDY.
And WOW did you see the picture he posted of the MOMMY,
she looks like she is 12 years old, check it out.
Yet he is so very proud of getting her DRUNK
and knocking her up. Guess she would not have had unprotected SEX with him, porn attorney and all unless she was drunk.
and knocking her up. Guess she would not have had unprotected SEX with him, porn attorney and all unless she was drunk.
Makes you wonder what was in that drink?
Makes you wonder why she was there with that dirty old man, a well known porn attorney and having unprotected SEX. Really? WOW. Why?
Makes you wonder why she was there with that dirty old man, a well known porn attorney and having unprotected SEX. Really? WOW. Why?
It sure does wreak of escort service to me but hey what do I know? NOT a THING.
At any rate, it is at the very LEAST irresponsible to have sex with this PORN ATTORNEY without protection and while drunk out on some Mexican beach. And YEPPERS better make an honest woman of her??? WOW how does that work? By Marrying a Moron, a Lying, Hypocritical abusive, EVIL porn attorney? I say NOT.
.jpg)
Marc Randazza says ya gotta love all speech and defends those who call other "wives" names and defends the most horrible, dark deeding folks of society yet gets his nutz in a grind over insinuations that his young hottie ever engaged in any kind of escorting? Really? Chill Dude..
Kick Back, have a Dube. CHILLAX.
Kick Back, have a Dube. CHILLAX.
More on the Whole Drunken Tryst with the Slut. Oh I many with the NICE, very young looking respectable woman, Jennifer Randazza, Jennifer Brochey Randazza, who had unprotected SEX with a Porn Attorney and was NOT an ESCORT, not on a PAID TRIP and is in NO WAY a Prostitute of ANY Kind, just to set the record STRAIGHT.
Page 14 of this Court Exhibit
OR
"Mrs. Legal Satyricon" in the Photo in the above blog post of Mr Randazza, well that is Jennifer Brochey Randazza, the Baby Mamma that sued Monica Foster "Ms. Mayers" for allegedly saying she was a prostitute. But more like insinuating she was had possible been a prostitute and saying she was a SLUT. Ya know all that SPEECH ya got love ALL OF. According to Big Daddy Mr. Randazza whose law firm represented his SLUT wife to sue a blogger calling names
and exercising Free Speech.
and exercising Free Speech.
Marc Randazza wishes Monica Foster, Ms. Mayers DEATH, outs her car make and model, her home address and well really wants her dead and gone. He harasses her, names her in my legal action, lies about her. And if she fights back well then SHE gets sued by the big bad ALLEGED mafia connected pedophile supporting, Free Speech ,NOT. loving attorney aKa Fucknut Marc Randazza.
Marc Randazza is the KING of CAN Dish it OUT but Wa Wa Can't Take it.
.jpg)
STOP WHINING
Stop Using the Federal Court System to Seek Revenge
on the WOMEN you don't like exercising Free Speech
about your big dumb ass and hypocritical legal practice.
In the Randazza v. Cox Lawsuit, Marc Randazza claims that I, Crystal Cox am a Public Figure. And well you bet I am. I was in newspapers around the world and on every United States network television News. I am reported on, blogged about, taught in law school, written about in books and YEP I am a Public Figure. Jennifer Randazza SUED me and Became a Public Figure.
Jennifer Randazza PURPOSELY interjected herself into the limelight by suing me, Crystal Cox, a PUBLIC Figure. Then she claims she is not a public figure and SUES "Ms. Mayers" what a CROCK.
SUE a PUBLIC FIGURE; BECOME A PUBLIC FIGURE
Here is where Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group Says, "Ms. Mayers got sued because she falsely accused my wife of engaging in prostitution."
Archive of RandazzaNews.com that Marc Randazza said I owned then Sued "Ms. Mayers" for It.
Page 2 of this one talks of the Death to Monica and outing her Car Details
Check out this "Ms. Mayer's" Video about the situation
See the THING is HERE "Mr. Randazza" if you are going to love SPEECH ya gotta love all that SHIT.. Right? NOPE not if you are talkin' bout my wife and kids, I don't like that shit. Wa Wa.
There is tons online regarding Jennifer being a Slut, or in a drunken tryst. And this was online BEFORE Monica Foster "Ms Mayers" ever spoke of Jennifer Randazza.
Therefore she had no malice, as it sure seems there is information online to suggest that Jennifer Randazza is indeed a SLUT. And she sure is a Public Figure after TWO years of her lawsuit against a PUBLIC FIGURE, Me.
The MERE act of Suing Me made her a PUBLIC Figure if Nothing Else; DUH
Daddy Danzza went on NPR and other high profile news outlets and talked or shall I say flat out LIED and whined about me, Crystal Cox. He talked of his baby, and his wife suing me,
Crystal Cox - a Public Figure.
Crystal Cox - a Public Figure.
Marc Randazza is a Public Figure and yet in all this PR, legal case and media outlets talking of this, Jennifer Slutdanzza claims to NOT be a Public FIGURE. WOW? that can't be True? Is she really claiming that? as a Matter of Law? WOW.
Even if Dizzy Dumbdazza aKa Jennifer Randazza was NOT a Public Figure before she, her baby, and her PUBLIC FIGURE attorney Marc Randazza sued me, a Public Figure, well then she certainly was as of Nov. 2012 when THEY sued me, Crystal Cox a PUBLIC Figure and talked about it in all media outlets that would listen and report.
As a matter of LAW, Jennifer Randazza interjected herself into a PUBLIC Figure status
by SUING Me, a Public Figure.
by SUING Me, a Public Figure.
The media around it has continued for over 2 years now. Then WOW sue "Ms. Mayers" and claim DITZY Dazza is NOT a Public Figure. WOW. How about NOT.
.jpg)
OBEY THE LAW ~ Tell the Truth
public figure
n. in the law of defamation (libel and slander), a personage of great public interest or familiarity like a government official, politician, celebrity, business leader, movie star, or sports hero. Incorrect harmful statements published about a public figure cannot be the basis of a lawsuit for defamation unless there is proof that the writer or publisher intentionally defamed the person with malice.
Public Figure
A description applied in Libel and Slander actions, as well as in those alleging invasion of privacy, to anyone who has gained prominence in the community as a result of his or her name or exploits, whether willingly or unwillingly. If a plaintiff in a libel or slander action qualifies as a public figure, he or she must show that the libelous or slanderous conduct of the defendant was motivated out of actual malice as required in the case of new york times co. v. sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964).
Here is the Defamation Complaint Filed, More Like a Nevada SLAP Suit.
Yes Posted on .. Never the Less, This is how Randazza SUPPRESSES Speech
Monica Foster ( "Ms. Mayers" )
Court Exhibit
SUING A PUBLIC FIGURE THEN GOING ON NPR AND TALKING ABOUT IT IN MEDIA, WELL JENNIFER RANDAZZA IS A PUBLIC FIGURE AND I ALLEGE A SLUT
More on the Randazza SLAPP Suit against "Ms Mayers", a Porn Industry INSIDER and Investigative Blogger EXPOSING the Porn Industry.
Monica Foster ( "Ms. Mayers" )
Randazza vs. Cox SLAPP Suit, Docket
Crystal Cox Counter Claim Against Marc Randazza
Marc Randazza Says Ya Gotta Step Back, and Ya Gotta Love ALL Speech
Comedian Crystal Cox Soon to Report On the Following:
Slutty Housewife SUES Powerful Public Figure, Blogger Crystal Cox and becomes Public Figure. Husband, Media Whore, get's his gang stalking, alleged mafia connected Porn Law Firm to represent her in suing bad girl blogger "Ms. Mayers" for allegedly implying an alleged slutty-tution on a drunken tryst that led to an inevitable knocking up of an innocent tramp after reportedly drinking a mixed drink as shown on daddy danza's blog post about the amazing drunken conception.
Baby Sues Blogger for Calling Mom a Slut
Baby Mamma sues Graphic Artist and Investigative Blogger reporting on her husband's support of pedophiles and human trafficking, for a parody Graphic 30 years into the future.
Baby Daddy is a Free Speech Attorney and alleged First Amendment Adovocate and uses his power over the courts to Abuse Process and bully, harass, and suppress SPEECH he does not like of Women alleging his drunken tryst hottie is a slut that may or may not have been possibly allegedly hired to escort his dumb, old man, porn attorney ass to Cabo where a spontaneous drunken tryst broke out on a Mexican beach after a mixed drink had been swallowed by the mother, according to reports by the father on the scene.
STAY TUNED
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)